Article
written by Christian Heil, CEO of L-ACOUSTICS and Paul Bauman,
L-ACOUSTICS Technical Support Director, for Pro Sound News USA
(issue dated April 2002).
When L-ACOUSTICS® introduced V-DOSC® in 1993, the audio
industry was skeptical since at that time, no other manufacturer
was using similar principles. Column speaker designs of the '50s
were considered outdated since the original work of Beranek and
Olsen didn't allow for extended bandwidth operation or coverage
over complex audience geometries. Only clear-sighted, adventurous
sound engineers and designers considered V-DOSC, listened to it,
used it, and embraced the product. Following this, it took years
of field experience, extensive training, technical support and
memorable tours to establish that V-DOSC had modernized sound
reinforcement. Benefits such as predictive, even coverage, longer
throw at higher frequencies, precise rigging accuracy and higher
SPL were proven over time. It is not surprising that most manufacturers
eventually decided to introduce a line array. Not less than 12
line arrays have been released within the past two years and a
new fashion movement has been launched!
L-ACOUSTICS'
initial R&D efforts focused on analysing the sound field
radiated by discrete sound sources [1]. The research goal was
to eliminate destructive interference within the main coverage
pattern while optimising destructive interference elsewhere
so that deviations from an ideal continuous ribbon source were
not audible. Objective arrayability criteria were established,
however, it was found difficult to make a line array operate
properly over the entire audio bandwidth. In "Wavefront
Sculpture Technology" [2], five conditions were presented
to achieve this goal. We define a "line source" as
a full-bandwidth line array that respects these five conditions
and therefore successfully approximates an ideal, continuous
ribbon source.
To
summarize, a line array can be considered as a line source if,
and only if, the following conditions are fulfilled:
1.
Active Radiating Factor (ARF)
Each sound source of the array radiates
a flat, isophasic wavefront and the area covered by the individual
sources is more
than 80% of the frame area that
contains the sources.
2. Frequency/Spacing
Dependence
If the sound sources of the array are
neither flat nor isophasic, the spacing between their acoustic
centers is less than half the wavelength
of the highest radiated frequency.
3.
Allowable Wavefront Curvature
The maximum deviation of the wavefront
radiated by individual sources from flat is less than a quarter
wavelength at the
highest operating frequency (5 mm at
16kHz).
4. Audience
Coverage
Relative tilt angles between enclosures
that comprise the line source array should vary in inverse proportion
to the listener
distance.
5. Inter-Element
Angle Limits
Relative tilt angles between adjacent
enclosures conform within the following limit:

where
is the maximum angle allowed between enclosures, ARF is
the active radiating factor, STEP is the vertical size of
each enclosure and
is the minimum allowed listener distance. |
V-DOSC
and dV-DOSC® are the physical embodiments of all 5 WST conditions
and the patented DOSC waveguide is the core technology that
allows for conditions #1& 3 to be satisfied. By defining
WST conditions, L-ACOUSTICS has provided guidelines for designing
a full-bandwidth line source, predicting results and indicating
where the trade-offs are.
There
are three important consequences of WST: (1) nearfield extension
over the entire audience provides compensation for air absorption
losses at high frequencies; (2) cylindrical wave propagation
in the nearfield offers reduced SPL attenuation over distance;
(3) the designer can smooth the SPL distribution over the audience
just by physically shaping the line source.
Cylindrical
Wavefronts
All loudspeaker arrays exhibit diverse wave propagation modes
which can be characterized as either a nearfield, farfield or
a chaotic field (a high interference domain which can't be described
in a simple analytical way). Any PA designer aims at eliminating
the chaotic field and this is achievable with more or less success
by using a line array. A line source exhibits two zones only,
nearfield or farfield, with a border that is size/frequency
dependant. The farfield of a line source is spherical (6 dB
attenuation per doubling of distance) while the nearfield of
a flat line source is cylindrical, showing an attenuation of
3 dB per doubling of distance. Denying these facts is a refusal
to read what has been published on the subject [1,2] and sound
engineers who have experienced the nearfield of a line source
know what it is all about.
About
the J-Shape
The J-shape designation is a popularisation of the 4th WST condition
applied to the case of a flat plane audience. For more complex
audience geometries, modelling tools such as L-ACOUSTICS' proprietary
ARRAY software should be used to configure the line source in
the most suitable shape. A common misconception is that there
should be no empty space between adjacent cabinets (gaps at
the front). The important issue is the active radiating factor
which should be higher than 80% and whether the rigging is front-
or rear-pivoting is not significant. In fact, the most restricting
factor is the 5th WST condition. This condition specifies a
trade-off between enclosure height, the maximum angle allowed
between enclosures and the minimum listener distance. For example,
it is not relevant to recommend a 10° angle between cabinets
containing front-loaded 15'' components (corresponding to a
nominal height or STEP of 0.50 m) unless the sound designer
is willing to accept audible lobes in the nearfield at mid/high
frequencies (>16 dB notches). For such an enclosure, the
5th WST condition specifies a maximum angle of 5° in order
to operate the line source from a distance of 10 m and onwards.
V-DOSC
Phase II ?
Since the introduction of V-DOSC in 1993 and dV-DOSC in 1999,
both systems have benefited from many upgrades in order to obtain
the highest levels of performance possible. Recent developments
include: precise rigging accessories, powerful lightweight amplifiers,
flying amplifier racks, flying subwoofers and improved digital
presets. Since both systems respect all 5 WST conditions, they
can be considered the most advanced line sources available.
All cabinets within the world-wide V-DOSC Network (3,300 V-DOSC,
>2,000 dV-DOSC) are compatible with respect to L-ACOUSTICS'
specifications. This makes V-DOSC and dV-DOSC the most complete
and advanced solution for rental companies while reinforcing
the strength of the V-DOSC Network. For these reasons, L-ACOUSTICS
is not planning to develop a second generation V-DOSC but will
continue to introduce improvements along with complementary
loudspeaker designs that serve as strategic sound design tools
- not as replacements.
This
rigorous process of product/system evolution is complemented
by a strong emphasis on technical support in the areas of: training
programs, modelling tools for touring applications (ARRAY),
advanced modelling tools for permanent installation (custom
dlls for CATT & EASE) along with consultancy services for
special events and installations. The highly-trained Certified
V-DOSC Engineer (CVE) or Qualified V-DOSC Technician (QVT) provide
a valuable knowledge base given their training and real-world
experience. It is important to understand that today V-DOSC
and dV-DOSC are not just speakers - they are part of a complete
system which includes the expertise of trained operators - all
of which are available on a worldwide basis according to a standard
that guarantees a consistently high level of performance to
the end user.
To conclude, a "line array"
performing as a line source is a very powerful tool which offers
many advantages and unparalleled performance. Nonetheless, there
are a number of restrictions regarding the use of a line array:
The requested
SPL is rarely the issue for a well-designed line array, however,
the number of cabinets necessary for a venue depends on its
geometry and can't be reduced due to the directional aspects
of the enclosures.
When multiple
arrays are focused in the same direction, nasty interference
can result due to coverage pattern overlap unless there is sufficient
distance between the arrays. This can occur with any loudspeaker
array, however, it is more critical for a line source since
it may counteract most of the line source's benefits of interference
control within the individual arrays.
The
last restriction is psychological: the system or venue are not
as responsible for the bad sound of a concert anymore and the
onus is more on the designer to work carefully with the technology.
WST requires one to change one's habits and ways of working
along with adopting a different way of listening.
[1]
Heil and Urban, "Sound Fields Radiated by Multiple Sound
Source Arrays", AES preprint #3269, 1992
[2] Urban, Heil and Bauman, "Wavefront Sculpture Technology'',
AES preprint #5488, 2001.